Trabalho Sujo - Home

Paranoia

4:20

E aos poucos a última temporada de Lost começa a dar as caras – mesmo que em uma imagem de divulgação, como esta acima, pinçada no TV Squad. O seriado volta para terminar tudo em menos de um mês e aqui assumo outra promessa: meu tão esperado texto sobre o último episódio da quinta temporada de Lost, mais minhas especulações sobre a próxima temporada. Ah sim, e claro: teremos a volta do bom e velho Comentando Lost. Sim, Ronaldo vai voltar a xingar em frente à TV, ahahahah

Enquanto não deschavo minha teoria, que tal embarcar em outra piração alheia? Desta vez quem propõe é o blogueiro Eye M Sick, que batiza sua especulação de A Teoria dos Três Cisnes Negros. Resumindo, ele diz que já aconteceram dois incidentes quase impossíveis de acontecer (como o nascimento de um cisne negro) na série: o primeiro seria o incidente em 1977 que vimos no final da temporada passada, que, em vez de prevenir a queda do vôo 815, torna-se sua causa; o segundo aconteceria antes da queda do avião, quando Desmond não vira a chave na escotilha e torna o céu roxo. O terceiro, que veríamos na próxima temporada, aconteceria em 2031 (!?) e seria o casamento de duas pessoas que conhecemos bem desde pequenos – Aaron e Ji Yeon – e o casamento de ambos acelerariam aquilo que muitos chamam de Ponto Ômega: o fim da evolução humana. Loucaço (e em inglês – se alguém traduzir, eu posto aqui).

Ih, senta que lá vem história. Resumindo bem, é uma teoria do teólogo, paleontologista e padre jesuíta francês Pierre Teilhard de Chardin, que advoga que a evolução humana tem sim um ponto final, que é quando todas as consciências se fundirão numa só e que a humanidade é um só ser, que habita o planeta inclusive fora de nossos corpos e mentes. Muita loucura? Vou citar a Wikipedia:

In this theory, the universe is constantly developing towards higher levels of material complexity and consciousness, a theory of evolution that Teilhard called the Law of Complexity/Consciousness. For Teilhard, the universe can only move in the direction of more complexity and consciousness if it is being drawn by a supreme point of complexity and consciousness. Thus Teilhard postulates the Omega Point as the supreme point of complexity and consciousness, which is not only as the term of the evolutionary process, but is also the actual cause for the universe to grow in complexity and consciousness. In other words, the Omega Point exists as supremely complex and conscious, independent of the evolving universe. I.e., the Omega Point is transcendent. In interpreting the universe this way, Teilhard kept the Omega Point within the orthodox views of the Christian God, who is transcendent (independent) of his creation.

Teilhard argued that the Omega Point resembles the Christian Logos, namely Christ, who draws all things into himself, who in the words of the Nicene Creed, is “God from God”, “Light from Light”, “True God from true God,” and “through him all things were made.”

Teilhard de Chardin’s The Phenomenon of Man states that the Omega Point must possess the following five attributes. It is:

  • Already existing – Only thus can the rise of the universe towards higher stages of consciousness be explained.
  • Personal – an intellectual being and not an abstract idea. The complexification of matter has not only led to higher forms of consciousness, but accordingly to more personalization, of which human beings are the highest attained form in the known universe. They are completely individualized, free centers of operation. It is in this way that man is said to be made in the image of God, who is the highest form of personality. Teilhard expressly stated that in the Omega Point, when the universe becomes One, human persons will not be suppressed, but super-personalized. Personality will be infinitely enriched. This is because the Omega Point unites creation, and the more it unites, the more the universe complexifies and rises in consciousness. Thus, as God creates the universe evolves towards higher forms of complexity, consciousness, and finally with humans, personality, because God, who is drawing the universe towards Him, is a person.
  • Transcendent – The Omega Point cannot be the result of the universe’s final complexification of itself on consciousness. Instead, the Omega Point must exist even before the universe’s evolution, because the Omega Point is responsible for the rise of the universe towards more complexity, consciousness and personality. Which essentially means that the Omega Point is outside the framework in which the universe rises, because it is by the attraction of the Omega Point that the universe evolves towards Him.
  • Autonomous – that is, free from the limitations of space (nonlocality) and time (atemporality).
  • Irreversible, that is, attainable.

Isso tudo pode ser entendido como uma metáfora para a apoteose (quando o Homem vira Deus – pensando que Deus não é uma entidade idosa que mora numa nuvem, mas uma espécie de alma do universo) do mesmo jeito que o Big Bang é um jeito nerd de explicar o Gênesis bíblico. Isso tem a ver com a teoria do Jesus Saltador (que o conhecimento humano está se acelerando cada vez mais e que isso pode ser medido numa unidade que o saudoso Robert Anton Wilson chamava de “Jesus” – escrevi sobre isso num texto pra versão em papel do falecido e-zine BScene, que foi citado pelo Petillo nesse texto no Digestivo Cultural) e com a velocidade do avanço tecnológico descrita pelos irmãos McKenna. A teoria também conversa com a dupla budismo/física quântica (“tudo é luz” equivale a “e=mc²”) e com o Aleph do Borges. E também tem a ver com a rede neural planetária que estamos vendo surgir com o avanço da internet – não é à toa que a teoria de Chardin influenciou ninguém menos do que o Karl Marx do mundo digital, nosso querido papa Marshall McLuhan. E pode até ter a ver com o tal “fim do mundo” dos maias, em 2012.

O certo é que tem algo que vai mudar tudo em breve. Não sei quão breve, mas se você acha que computador + internet foram um salto evolutivo violento, eu aposto que essa dupla é só um degrauzinho baixo comparado com o que vem por aí.

Writing about conspiracy theory in Libra, government cover-ups in White Noise, the Cold War in Underworld, and 9/11 in Falling Man, “DeLillo’s books have been weirdly prophetic about twenty-first century America” (The New York Times Book Review). Now, in Point Omega, he takes on the secret strategists in America’s war machine. In the middle of a desert “somewhere south of nowhere,” to a forlorn house made of metal and clapboard, a secret war advisor has gone in search of space and time. Richard Elster, seventy-three, was a scholar—an outsider—when he was called to a meeting with government war planners. They asked Elster to conceptualize their efforts— to form an intellectual framework for their troop deployments, counterinsurgency, orders for rendition. For two years he read their classified documents and attended secret meetings. He was to map the reality these men were trying to create. “Bulk and swagger,” he called it. At the end of his service, Elster retreats to the desert, where he is joined by a filmmaker intent on documenting his experience. Jim Finley wants to make a one-take film, Elster its single character—“Just a man against a wall.” The two men sit on the deck, drinking and talking. Finley makes the case for his film. Weeks go by. And then Elster’s daughter Jessie visits—an “otherworldly” woman from New York—who dramatically alters the dynamic of the story. When a devastating event follows, all the men’s talk, the accumulated meaning of conversation and connection, is thrown into question. What is left is loss, fierce and incomprehensible.

E uma das coisas que podemos esperar para esse ano é o novo do Don DeLillo, um dos maiores escritores vivos (e um de meus favoritos). O título do livro – que parece que conversa com um de seus clássicos, o calhamaço Submundo – é exatamente Omega Point e antes que você se perca na sinopse acima, descolei um trecho do livro neste site (em inglês):

The true life is not reducible to words spoken or written, not by anyone, ever. The true life takes place when we’re alone, thinking, feeling, lost in memory, dreamingly selfaware, the submicroscopic moments. He said this more than once, Elster did, in more than one way. His life happened, he said, when he sat staring at a blank wall, thinking about dinner.

An eight-hundred-page biography is nothing more than dead conjecture, he said.

I almost believed him when he said such things. He said we do this all the time, all of us, we become ourselves beneath the running thoughts and dim images, wondering idly when we’ll die. This is how we live and think whether we know it or not. These are the unsorted thoughts we have looking out the train window, small dull smears of meditative panic.

The sun was burning down. This is what he wanted, to feel the deep heat beating into his body, feel the body itself, reclaim the body from what he called the nausea of News and Traffic.

This was desert, out beyond cities and scattered towns. He was here to eat, sleep and sweat, here to do nothing, sit and think. There was the house and then nothing but distances, not vistas or sweeping sightlines but only distances. He was here, he said, to stop talking. There was no one to talk to but me. He did this sparingly at first and never at sunset. These were not glorious retirement sunsets of stocks and bonds. To Elster sunset was human invention, our perceptual arrangement of light and space into elements of wonder. We looked and wondered. There was a trembling in the air as the unnamed colors and landforms took on definition, a clarity of outline and extent. Maybe it was the age difference between us that made me think he felt something else at last light, a persistent disquiet, uninvented. This would explain the silence.

The house was a sad hybrid. There was a corrugated metal roof above a clapboard exterior with an unfinished stonework path out front and a tacked-on deck jutting from one side. This is where we sat through his hushed hour, a torchlit sky, the closeness of hills barely visible at high white noon.

News and Traffic. Sports and Weather. These were his acid terms for the life he’d left behind, more than two years of living with the tight minds that made the war. It was all background noise, he said, waving a hand. He liked to wave a hand in dismissal. There were the risk assessments and policy papers, the interagency working groups. He was the outsider, a scholar with an approvalrating but no experience in government. He sat at a table in a secure conference room with the strategic planners and military analysts. He was there to conceptualize, his word, in quotes, to apply overarching ideas and principles to such matters as troop deployment and counterinsurgency. He was cleared to read classified cables and restricted transcripts, he said, and he listened to the chatter of the resident experts, the metaphysicians in the intelligence agencies, the fantasists in the Pentagon.

The third floor of the E ring at the Pentagon. Bulk and swagger, he said.

He’d exchanged all that for space and time. These were things he seemed to absorb through his pores. There were the distances that enfolded every feature of the landscape and there was the force of geologic time, out there somewhere, the string grids of excavators searching for weathered bone.

I keep seeing the words. Heat, space, stillness, distance. They’ve become visual states of mind. I’m not sure what that means. I keep seeing figures in isolation, I see past physical dimension into the feelings that these words engender, feelings that deepen over time. That’s the other word, time.

I drove and looked. He stayed at the house, sitting on the creaky deck in a band of shade, reading. I hiked into palm washes and up unmarked trails, always water, carrying water everywhere, always a hat, wearing a broadbrimmed hat and a neckerchief, and I stood on promontories in punishing sun, stood and looked. The desert was outside my range, it was an alien being, it was science fiction, both saturating and remote, and I had to force myself to believe I was here.

He knew where he was, in his chair, alive to the protoworld, I thought, the seas and reefs of ten million years ago. He closed his eyes, silently divining the nature of later extinctions, grassy plains in picture books for children, a region swarming with happy camels and giant zebras, mastodons, sabertooth tigers.

Extinction was a current theme of his. The landscape inspired themes. Spaciousness and claustrophobia. This would become a theme.

O livro sai lá fora no mês que vem e, ao contrário dos livros mais clássicos de DeLillo, é um volume curto, com menos de duzentas páginas.

4:20

“Ninguém sai”, já avisaram os produtores da série: ou seja, cenas inéditas da próxima temporada, só quando ela começar. Nada de promos, comerciais ou previews com imagens que ainda não vimos. Mas se você tá seco por spoilers, sugiro começar o ano dando uma passada no Carlão. Além de várias novidades que não sabemos sobre Lost, ele ainda linka a imagem acima, pescada no DarkUfo, que resume com o seguinte o texto:

Nos primeiros 11 episódios da temporada haverá um diálogo entre Jacob e Richard Alpert no qual o conceito-chave de ‘Lost’ será ‘explicado’ através de uma analogia“.

Uma dica que Andy dá é: não pensem em vulcões. E nem em xadrez. E nem em…champanhe.

Ã?